Thinking about risk and policy

I saw this L.A. Times article on teenage drivers referenced on Bruce Schneier’s excellent security blog.  Essentially, California passed laws that heavily restricted 16 and 17 year old drivers, hoping to save lives.  While statistics do show the deaths went down in that age category, there was a commensurate increase in fatalities in 18 and 19 year olds.  One way of interpreting that information is that the gains from the restrictions weren’t eliminating fatalities, only deferring it.  Sounds like the policymakers have the behaviors targeted well, they just need to find better means to change them, rather than delay them for 2 years.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s